Models change. The Workspace stays. More client work. Same team.
We call it an AI worker because its purpose is to help you work and carry out real work in the systems your business uses. Its persistent Workspace holds the context, files and approved access that work needs.
A company-controlled execution environment around a durable client Workspace.
We call it an AI worker. On purpose.
The word “worker” means something: there is work to do, context to understand and a result to reach. Agent describes the ability to act. Worker defines the purpose we give that ability.
The AI worker we believe in exists to help you work and carry out real work online: read the relevant information, update the CRM, work across websites and business systems, and use an API when the task calls for it — within its approved access and permissions.
The work may cross several systems. The objective stays the same. The worker should keep the context, move the task forward and know when a decision needs you.
We measure it by the work completed.
For example: read a meeting summary, update the right CRM record and prepare the follow-up for your approval.
The Workspace is the durable operating home.
Client identity, Context, Skills, Routines and work records belong together. Keep that operating home around the model you choose.
A company-controlled Mac today
Local files, installed apps, browser work and configured networks give the worker somewhere to execute. The company supplies the Mac and model access.
Choose the environment for the work
Evaluate access, persistence, privacy and cost. Local and remote environments have different strengths; location alone does not determine who controls the operating setup.
Use the model that makes sense for the work. Keep the Workspace around it.
What changes when the tools share a working environment?
| Operating model | Separate tools | A worker with a Workspace |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | One tool for copy, another for images, another for video | A capable model that understands the objective and plans the work |
| 02 | One tool for campaign optimisation, one for reports | Approved access to the business systems that client uses |
| 03 | A separate interface for every marketing channel | A workspace that knows which client it belongs to |
| 04 | Context and history scattered across all of them | Context and reviewed learning that stay with the company |
| 05 | A separate subscription and setup for each new need | A durable client Workspace around supported execution |
| 06 | A person acting as the integration layer between them | Humans setting the goals and approving the sensitive actions |
Six parts. One worker.
The model reasons. A Workspace gives it somewhere to work, something to remember and permission to act.
The operating home
Client identity, files, approved accounts and work records stay together.
The reasoning
Reason, plan, write and analyse with the model suited to the work.
The working environment
Supported agent environments turn an objective into tool use and execution.
The execution surfaces
APIs, browser work and files connect the task to business systems within supported scope.
The working knowledge
Client knowledge and human-reviewed methods stay versioned and separate.
The operating infrastructure
Workspaces bring approved access, supported execution and reviewed methods together.
Runtime and provider names identify products; they imply no partnership or endorsement.
One objective, one client, one loop that closes.
Follow an approved request, a refused wrong-client request and a model change. This conceptual loop shows the boundaries around the work.
Illustrative model, not a recording of a customer account. Runtime names are shown to identify approved agent environments — no partnership or endorsement is implied.
- The objective — a person defines the work, the boundaries, and what needs approval.
- The execution environment — a company-controlled Mac today. The files, context, tools and operating knowledge stay here.
- The runtime and model — replaceable. Claude Code, Claude Cowork or Codex today; an approved open model is a stated vision, not a shipped capability.
- The access decision — Outloop resolves the right client, the right account or resource, and the permitted action, without exposing the raw credential.
- The client systems — approved work reaches Google Ads, Meta, Drive, GA4 or another approved business system.
- The audited result — allowed and denied attempts are both written to a redacted local audit.
- Reviewed learning — a lesson becomes a context revision only after a person approves it, and it can be rolled back.
- A request naming the wrong client is denied at the access decision with RESOURCE_ID_NOT_ALLOWED, before any backend call, and the denial is audited.
- The model can be swapped for another approved runtime while the workplace, the audit and the reviewed learning stay in place.
You set the boundaries.
The work moves inside them.
Give the worker a task. Keep each client’s accounts, context and decisions in the right Workspace.
A person sets the direction
Define the task and the boundaries before the worker starts.
Use the approved account
The Workspace identifies the intended client, account and resources.
Work inside those boundaries
The worker uses supported APIs, browser work and files.
Keep the decision with you
Sensitive work waits for human approval. Supported allow and refusal events leave a record.
What Outloop brings to the Workspace
Separate client Workspaces, approved accounts and resources, supported runtimes, reviewed working methods, Context, Skills, Routines and work history.
Outloop provides the operating environment around AI runtimes. It is not an AI model, a password vault or a collection of connectors. Reusing a method does not transfer private client state.
Read the security model or follow a denied multi-client request.
The method is the asset.
Turn work that succeeds into a reviewed Skill, Routine or playbook. Start the next client from that method, with their own accounts and Context.
Share the method.
Keep the client’s data private.
A person decides what becomes reusable. Private information, performance figures, creative assets and execution stay inside each client’s Workspace.
What is proven, and what still needs measurement
Client Context and reviewed Learning are live. Reuse of client-neutral implementation is qualitatively proven. Setup time, magnitude of gains and repeatability at scale are not yet quantified. Private state does not move automatically.
Change the runtime.
Keep the work around it.
Choose capability that fits the task. Evaluate cost alongside quality, tools and operational requirements.
Run with Claude Code
Use a ready, supported runtime for the work.
Continue with Codex
Current Routine continuity preserves instructions, schedule and history between ready Claude Code and Codex.
What carries over today?
Current Routine continuity covers instructions, schedule and history between ready Claude Code and Codex. It does not promise arbitrary session or machine migration.
Smaller, open and local models may expand the choice over time. Outloop does not automatically route by cost, guarantee savings or promise universal local-model parity.
A computer belongs
to the physical world.
A company machine can connect to a phone, capture equipment, storage and the company network. The environment extends beyond a browser tab.
Calls and messages
A company phone, number and SIM can belong to the role.
Cameras and microphones
Connect approved production equipment to the company machine.
The company network
Work within the networks and resources the company configures.
Files and local equipment
A machine can connect to approved storage and studio equipment.
Connected equipment is possible today.
Outloop does not supply, provision or natively manage these devices. Physical connection does not grant an AI worker permission to operate them. Remote environments can also support device workflows.
The longer-term vision
Broader governed autonomy over connected equipment, deeper device operation and teams of specialised AI workers. These remain a direction, under permissions, audit and human control.
Ambition needs an honest line.
What runs today, how to set it up, and what we still have to prove.
Shipped and verified
today
-
Client Workspaces with approved Context and resource binding
proven -
Recorded allowed and refused Google Ads / Meta requests
proven -
Reviewed Learning, Skills and Routines within supported scope
live -
Routine instructions, schedule and history retained across ready Claude Code / Codex switches
Stable 1.45.0 -
Reuse of client-neutral implementation work
qualitatively provenMagnitude and external implementer repeatability are not yet quantified at scale.
The current operating model
how to set it up
-
A company-controlled Apple Silicon Mac
current modelThe current execution environment, with configured files, apps and network access.
-
Configure and validate every client separately
operating practiceReuse the method; keep private Context, accounts, resources and history separate.
-
Choose the supported runtime for the workload
operator choiceBalance capability, cost and operational requirements; Outloop does not automatically choose the cheapest model.
These are operating choices, not a claim of universal machine or runtime support.
Where we think this goes
not shipped
-
Broader economic runtime optionality
directionSmaller, open and local models may become suitable for more routine work. This is not universal local-model parity or guaranteed savings.
-
Broader Workspace portability
directionComplete cross-provider and cross-machine migration is not a shipped promise. Current Routine continuity has a specific supported scope.
-
More resilient work across execution surfaces
hypothesisAn operating principle to prove workflow by workflow; never a promise that an AI worker cannot get stuck.
Nothing in this column is sold, priced, or promised on a date. It is written down so you can hold us to the difference.
See the work behind the idea.
A prediction is worth very little on its own. These are the workflows where the argument stops being theoretical.
Agents across many clients
What running agents across a book of clients actually looks like, and where the access breaks first.
Read itThe system, end to end
What Outloop actually is today — the company-controlled Mac, approved access, files, audit and reviewed learning.
Read itA wrong-client request, denied
Recorded Google Ads and Meta proof: configured approved requests succeed and out-of-scope requests are refused.
Read itSandboxed agent workflows
Why a sandboxed agent stops mid-workflow, and what changes when access is granted properly.
Read itTake the whole argument with you.
The original vision, on one A4 page. Take it to a partner meeting or a leadership conversation; this page carries the latest scope and product details.
PDF · A4 · no form
We ran an agency. The agent was never the problem.
Every workflow we built worked beautifully in a demo and then stalled in the same place: the moment it needed access to a real client's systems. Someone had to stop, find a key, paste it somewhere, and remember which account belonged to which client.
We were not missing a smarter model. We were missing the layer that decides what an agent is allowed to do, for whom — so the work can continue without a person handing over credentials, and without the wrong client's account ever being touched.
That layer is what we build. The rest of this page is where we think it leads.
Adam Argaman
Founder & CEO, Outloop
One person will manage one AI worker — and later, a team of them.
That is the direction: a team of workers with clear objectives, separate client Workspaces and human review where it matters. The company keeps the operating knowledge.
- The model
- thinks.
- The computer
- runs the work.
- The API
- performs the action.
- Outloop
- routes, separates and controls access.
Models change. The Workspace stays.
Live product with setup guides and product support · Keys stay local · Cancel anytime